← Search

Steve Waters

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
AMBLER, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
12 matches · 8W–4L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history12 matches
W
2026-06-13 · Grey Wolves · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Peterson
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-30 · Grey Wolves · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Peterson
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-07-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe Venneri
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
Michael DiPaolo / Kevin Sullivan
2025-06-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe Venneri
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
Emmett Gallagher / Paraag Sarva
2025-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Ransom
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-05-17 · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe Venneri
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
W
2025-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Manuel Carbajo
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Manuel Carbajo
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2019-01-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Denise Gozdan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2018-12-01 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Denise Gozdan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
Christine Moran / Timothy Moran
2018-10-27 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Denise Gozdan mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 64.5% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
4 matches
#1 Singles
8%
1 match
#4 Doubles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer