Bari Rosenberg
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Long Branch, NJ
47 matches · 28W–19L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history47 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
71.4%
25W–10L · 55.9% of games
3.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 40.6% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.