← Search

Neil Damon

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Providence, RI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 30W–26L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history56 matches
L
2026-08-26 · AH: Horwitz · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew Horwitz
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 3-4
L
2026-08-24 · AH: Horwitz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Damon
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 2-5
L
2026-08-14 · AH: Dow · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Diehl
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-12 · AH: Dow · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edwin Gorham
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-02 · AH: Horwitz · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Damon
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-29 · AH: Horwitz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with William Binder
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-25 · AH: Horwitz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Douglas Ditmars
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-09 · AH: Dow · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Marren
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 3-4
L
2026-06-21 · AH: Dow · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Spear
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-15 · AH: Dow · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Marren
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-08-05 · AH: Lobsters/Dow · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Edwin Gorham
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 0-6, 1-3
L
2025-07-15 · AH: Lobsters/Dow · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Diehl
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
50%
4W–4L · 54.6% of games
7.0
56.5%
26W–20L · 55.6% of games
8.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
39%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer