← Search

Skip Rowe

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
SARASOTA, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
48 matches · 23W–25L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history48 matches
L
2026-09-01 · TPC Risquez · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joseph Casanova
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-08-18 · TPC Risquez · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with RON NOURSE
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-07-19 · SARASOTA/Weitzel · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Protigal championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-19 · SARASOTA/Weitzel · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joel Pyser championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · SARASOTA/Weitzel · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Protigal championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-07-18 · SARASOTA/Weitzel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leo Bugo championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
N/A
2026-03-21 · SARASOTA/Weitzel · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marc J Seguin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-07 · SARASOTA/Weitzel · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Tympanick
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gregory Childers championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6
L
Brad Armagost / David MacAdam
2026-01-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gregory Childers championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-03 · Sarasota/Risquez · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gustavo Risquez
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-12 · Sarasota/Risquez · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gregory Childers
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
50%
3W–3L · 49.1% of games
4.0
53.3%
16W–14L · 52.1% of games
7.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 49% of games
0.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches
#2 Mixed Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe