← Search

Cory Gillespie

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
BELTON, SC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 59W–38L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history97 matches
W
Default
2026-04-19 · UPTA40A/Englisbe/ACAC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Scott Parsons
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-18 · UPTA (A) 4.5M 18 & Over (Vasques) · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jack Coleman
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-03-29 · UPTA40A/Englisbe/ACAC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jason Englisbe
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-14 · UPTA (A) 4.5M 18 & Over (Vasques) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kenneth Kolakowski
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-03-08 · UPTA40A/Englisbe/ACAC · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jason Englisbe
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · UPTA40A/Englisbe/ACAC · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Henrique Rodrigues
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-09-11 · UPTA18C/Brown/Brookstone · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elliott Dykes
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-08-27 · UPTA18C/Brown/Brookstone · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Scott Mouzon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-08-02 · UPTA18T/Brown/Brookstone · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with JAVIER CANALES-ZAVALA
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-07-13 · UPTA18M/Fulbright/Brookstone · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kerry Howard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-07-12 · UPTA18T/Brown/Brookstone · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Duncan Hogg
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-07-05 · UPTA18T/Brown/Brookstone · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Duncan Hogg
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 45.2% of games
4.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 63.8% of games
4.5
55.2%
16W–13L · 50.6% of games
7.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 53.4% of games
4.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 53.1% of games
8.0mixed
70.8%
17W–7L · 55.5% of games
9.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
47 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
18 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams