← Search

Jennifer Napierski

Provo, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
176 matches · 124W–52L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Napierski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history176 matches
W
2026-08-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Pierce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-07-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Pickard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Pierce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Pierce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Pierce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Debby Richards / Jennifer Jensen
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Halladay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shauna Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Pierce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Pierce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Pierce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
78.1%
50W–14L · 61.4% of games
4.0
68.2%
60W–28L · 56.6% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
44 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
12 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
7 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe