← Search

Tami Jost

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
RICHARDSON, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
481 matches · 267W–214L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history481 matches
L
2026-11-01 · Team 27 Spring Park/Nolen-Harvey W3.5S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Clapp
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-25 · Team 27 Spring Park/Nolen-Harvey W3.5S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Vorel
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-23 · RTC CATES · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brenda Howard
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-10-12 · RTC CATES · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Larza
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-10-10 · RTC CATES · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Boudrika
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-0
L
2026-10-09 · RTC CATES · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Ahmad
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-08 · RTC CATES · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Lindstrom
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-20 · Team 27 Spring Park/Nolen-Harvey W3.5S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Vorel
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-09-19 · RTC CATES · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Thompson
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-09-13 · Team 27 Spring Park/Nolen-Harvey W3.5S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Vorel
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-5
L
2026-09-06 · HTC HOWARD · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rusty Hall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-30 · HTC HOWARD · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brad Jost mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams103 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
65.2%
90W–48L · 56.7% of games
4.0
30.1%
28W–65L · 41.2% of games
7.0
80%
24W–6L · 64.6% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually Singles, 42% of the time
Singles
42%
202 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
81 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
81 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
56 matches
#1 Singles
7%
33 matches
#2 Singles
5%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer