← Search

Allison Cocker

Riverside, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 42W–28L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Allison Cocker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
L
2026-08-29 · IE-Canyon Crest-Pereya · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Cocker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-02 · IE-Canyon Crest-Pereya · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Cocker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · IE-CCCC-Hebert · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Cocker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-31 · IE-CCCC-Hebert · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Cocker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-18 · IE-CCCC-Hebert · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Cocker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-09 · IE-CCCC-Hebert · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Cocker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-02-28 · IE-CCCC-Hebert · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Cocker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-31 · IE-CCCC-Hebert · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Cocker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-17 · #2 Doubles · with Amy Growsky championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-12-14 · #1 Doubles · with Dang Nguyen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
Gladys Esponda / Victor Zayas
2025-12-13 · #1 Doubles · with David Cocker championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-11-09 · IE-LLW-CCCC-Hebert · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexa Stanfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 54.6% of games
4.0
52%
13W–12L · 46.5% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 58.1% of games
8.0mixed
80%
12W–3L · 54.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
19 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova