← Search

Sarah Feirn

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
New Orleans, LA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 97W–30L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2023. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history127 matches
W
2026-10-13 · Cordes/40/8.5/CWD/NOCC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Karen Eastman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-10-06 · Cordes/40/8.5/CWD/NOCC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Wooten
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-09-30 · Cordes/40/8.5/CWD/NOCC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Jackson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-09-22 · Cordes/40/8.5/CWD/NOCC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Wooten
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-09-08 · Cordes/40/8.5/CWD/NOCC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Wooten
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-25 · Cordes/40/8.5/CWD/NOCC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Wooten
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-18 · Cordes/18/DIII/TWD/NOCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marceline DeLaureal
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-28 · Saulsbury/18+/4.0/NOD/NOCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marceline DeLaureal
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-04-14 · Saulsbury/18+/4.0/NOD/NOCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marceline DeLaureal
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-17 · Saulsbury/18+/4.0/NOD/NOCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Moore
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-10 · Saulsbury/18+/4.0/NOD/NOCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marceline DeLaureal
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-03-09 · Cordes-Kallenborn/40+/4.0/NOD/NOCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Freeman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
90.9%
70W–7L · 67.2% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 50.5% of games
8.5
60.5%
26W–17L · 57.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
14 matches
#1 Singles
6%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe