← Search

Rob Snyder

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Crozet, VA
4.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
34 matches · 21W–13L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history34 matches
W
2026-07-19 · BHSC - Watson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lorenzo Davis
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-09 · BHSC - Watson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Luke Fairborn
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-20 · BHSC - Watson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rushman Andrews
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-05-19 · BHSC-Welch · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Voelmle mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-04-26 · BHSC-Welch · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Beverley Garbaccio mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-7
L
2024-04-15 · BHSC-Welch · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lesley Hock mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2024-04-14 · BHSC-Welch · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lesley Hock mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 2-6
L
2024-03-17 · BHSC-Welch · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Voelmle mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
L
2023-10-29 · BHSC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lindsay Phillips mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 3-6
W
2023-10-06 · BHSC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lindsay Phillips mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-4
W
2023-10-01 · BHSC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amy Taggart mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2023-09-24 · BHSC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lindsay Phillips mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
71.4%
15W–6L · 55.7% of games
8.5
75%
3W–1L · 51.2% of games
7.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 53.6% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 36.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
9 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert