← Search

Janet Arnesty

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Francisco, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 34W–77L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history111 matches
L
2026-10-28 · TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC CW7.5A-DT · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cherub Halperin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-23 · TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC CW7.5A-DT · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carrie Pomerantz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-15 · TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC CW7.5A-DT · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen Forsthoff
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-12 · TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC CW7.5A-DT · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carrie Pomerantz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-18 · TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC CW7.5A-DT · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Paula Mangin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-09-11 · TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC CW7.5A-DT · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jacinta Mccann
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-10 · GOLDMAN TC 55AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daphne Zenk
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-04-26 · TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC 55AW7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lilian Tom
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-25 · TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC 55AW7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rachel Major
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-18 · TENNIS COALITION SF/GOLDMAN TC 55AW7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rachel Major
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-15 · GOLDMAN TC 55AW8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janis Porto
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-21 · GOLDMAN TC 40AW4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammy Mason
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
35.7%
15W–27L · 45.6% of games
7.0
0%
0W–4L · 35.5% of games
7.5
11.8%
2W–15L · 37.8% of games
8.0
50%
9W–9L · 50.4% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
5W–10L · 47.3% of games
8.0mixed
20%
3W–12L · 37.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
22 matches
#1 Singles
5%
6 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer