← Search

Sonia Arana

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Sleepy Hollow, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
223 matches · 117W–106L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history223 matches
L
2026-10-16 · Mount Kisco Country Club 4.0 Fall · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samantha Nick
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-09-22 · Mount Kisco Country Club 4.0 Fall · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samantha Nick
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-19 · CFB: Commanders · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sean Foster mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-04-12 · Club Fit Briarcliff · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samantha Nick
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-03 · Club Fit Briarcliff · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Cohen
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-29 · Club Fit Briarcliff · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Cohen
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-22 · Club Fit Briarcliff · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diana Kolev
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-15 · CFB: Commanders · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sean Foster mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-01 · CFB: Commanders · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Segal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-02-20 · CFB: Commanders · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Segal mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-4
W
2025-11-09 · Club Fit Briarcliff · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ashutosh Shankar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-26 · Club Fit Briarcliff · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ashutosh Shankar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
53.4%
95W–83L · 49.4% of games
4.5
16.7%
2W–10L · 30.9% of games
7.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 54.8% of games
8.0mixed
50%
9W–9L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
86 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
47 matches
#1 Singles
13%
29 matches
#2 Singles
5%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert