Search

Karen Beaudry

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
107 matches · 61W–46L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.84
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 25 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
98%
stay 3.0
2%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
144 of 213
WA · 3.0
616 of 960

Karen is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Karen has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Karen has gone from the 74th to the 37th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
53.7%
29W–25L · 50.6% of games
6.0
69.7%
23W–10L · 55.4% of games
6.0mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 45.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history107 matches
L
Gena Bettin / TESSA GORMAN
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Stonecipher
+0.002about as expected — took 50% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
Jason Messer / Eloisa Tangmixed
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Beaudry
+0.000about as expected — took 52% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Ryan McLaughlin / Brenna Lourymixed
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Iyyappa Murugandi
+0.000better than expected — took 65% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Angie Godfrey / Jenny Davis
2026-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Stonecipher
0.050below expectation — took 29% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Kristen Mosebar / Steve Pignottimixed
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Beaudry
+0.000about as expected — took 44% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
Nicole Carrido / Darren Carridomixed
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nagendra Jammi
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Cheryl Borgonia / KAYOKO SHIBUE
2026-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with April Ancinas
0.025below expectation — took 38% of games against 50% expected
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with April Ancinas
+0.024better than expected — took 50% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
Jade Phanchamps
2026-06-12 · #1 Singles
0.011below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Louise Farrell
2026-04-29 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.050below expectation — took 33% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Xiaoying Qiao
2026-04-08 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.019below expectation — took 57% of games against 63% expected
1-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
April Boyce
2026-03-25 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.008better than expected — took 75% of games against 70% expected
6-4, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.