← Search

Emperatriz Fernandez

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Chanhassen, MN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
194 matches · 108W–86L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history194 matches
L
2026-10-31 · NE/Nastase/55&Over7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Ellzey championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-10-30 · NE/Nastase/55&Over7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Ellzey championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-19 · NE/Nastase/55&Over7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Ellzey championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-19 · NE/Nastase/55&Over7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Ellzey championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-07-17 · NE/Nastase/55&Over7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicolette Diamantis championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-29 · NORGAARD Summer Slammers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alicia Esteban
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · NE/Nastase/55&Over7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vicki Shaner
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-13 · NE/Nastase/55&Over7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicolette Diamantis
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · NE/Nastase/55&Over7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Korsos
loading the estimate
5-5
L
2026-05-11 · NORGAARD Summer Slammers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Hilo
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-05-04 · NORGAARD Summer Slammers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Stifter
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-06-23 · NE/Blake/55&Over7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alice Blake
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
50%
4W–4L · 51.6% of games
3.5
61.4%
54W–34L · 52.7% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 54.6% of games
7.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 49.8% of games
7.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 47.3% of games
8.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 49.1% of games
7.0mixed
53.7%
22W–19L · 53.2% of games
8.0mixed
25%
3W–9L · 41.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
68 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
58 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams