← Search

Michael Prince

Portland, OR
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
13 matches · 2W–11L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Michael Prince to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history13 matches
L
2026-04-04 · WHRC-Lipke · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Skoog mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-7
L
2022-06-12 · WHRC-Prince/Ambard · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Jennings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2022-06-11 · WHRC-Prince/Ambard · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alberto Ambard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2022-04-30 · WHRC-Prince/Ambard · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alberto Ambard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2022-04-16 · WHRC-Prince/Ambard · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alberto Ambard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2022-04-08 · WHRC-Prince/Ambard · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alberto Ambard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2022-02-20 · WHRC-Jennings · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alberto Ambard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2022-02-06 · WHRC-Jennings · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alberto Ambard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Andrew Daddio / John Baker
2022-01-30 · WHRC-Jennings · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Larry Corwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2022-01-16 · WHRC-Jennings · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alberto Ambard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2020-02-22 · MAC-Wright · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zachary Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2020-02-15 · MAC-Wright · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2010–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 41% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
2 matches
#1 Singles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe