Search

Michael Prince

Portland, OR
3.5S year-end 2026
13 matches · 2W–11L · seasons 20202026
Where Michael sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Michael is one of 1159 men at 3.5 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 59% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams17 teams · 2010–2026
WHRC-Lipke
2026 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2026
WHRC-Jennings
2022 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2022
WHRC-Prince/Ambard
2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men
2022
MAC-Wright
2020 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2020
MAC-Wright
2020 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2020
MAC-Smith/Nuss
2014 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2014
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Michael has been a steady 3.5 across all 2 seasons on record.

3.03.520202022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 41% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history13 matches
L
2026-04-04 · WHRC-Lipke · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Skoog
+0.000below expectation — took 32% of games against 45% expected
6-0, 7-6
L
2022-06-12 · WHRC-Prince/Ambard · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Jennings
0.021below expectation — took 37% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2022-06-11 · WHRC-Prince/Ambard · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alberto Ambard
+0.005about as expected — took 38% of games against 39% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2022-04-30 · WHRC-Prince/Ambard · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alberto Ambard
0.006about as expected — took 41% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2022-04-16 · WHRC-Prince/Ambard · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alberto Ambard
0.007below expectation — took 37% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2022-04-08 · WHRC-Prince/Ambard · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alberto Ambard
+0.038better than expected — took 75% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
2022-02-20 · WHRC-Jennings · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alberto Ambard
0.051below expectation — took 25% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Lance Campbell / Jason Hyde
2022-02-06 · WHRC-Jennings · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alberto Ambard
+0.032better than expected — took 50% of games against 39% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Andrew Daddio / John Baker
2022-01-30 · WHRC-Jennings · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Larry Corwin
+0.003about as expected — took 43% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
Kevin Pham / Wiley Zhao
2022-01-16 · WHRC-Jennings · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alberto Ambard
0.045below expectation — took 20% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2020-02-22 · MAC-Wright · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zachary Wright
+0.011about as expected — took 44% of games against 41% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2020-02-15 · MAC-Wright · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.017below expectation — took 37% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.