← Search

Sue Mills

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lafayette, CO
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 28W–22L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history50 matches
L
2026-06-03 · MEA GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristen Brynestad
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-20 · MEA GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Molly Kirk
loading the estimate
7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-13 · MEA GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jinfang Li
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-21 · MEA TEAL · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Teri Jean Fry
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-05-14 · MEA TEAL · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Megan Murray
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-06-11 · MEA GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Faughnan
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2024-06-05 · MEA RED · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Cendali
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-06-04 · MEA GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Dahlstrom
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2024-05-22 · MEA RED · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shawna Sharp
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
W
2024-05-21 · MEA GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Dahlstrom
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2024-05-01 · MEA RED · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Molly Kirk
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-04-28 · MEA GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara McDowell
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
90%
18W–2L · 61% of games
4.0
26.3%
5W–14L · 43.2% of games
7.0
50%
4W–4L · 43.9% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova