← Search

Jannine Leshem

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Simsbury, CT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
231 matches · 125W–106L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history231 matches
W
2026-08-23 · RH:Daysippers:Leshem/Piazza · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Kochis championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-23 · RH:Daysippers:Leshem/Piazza · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Piazza championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-22 · RH:Daysippers:Leshem/Piazza · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Piazza championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-21 · RH:Daysippers:Leshem/Piazza · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Piazza championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-16 · RH:Double Shots North:Siebert/Mendillo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynn Siebert
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · RFL:Return to Senders:Leshem/Piazza · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Raul Valdes mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-27 · RFL:Return to Senders:Leshem/Piazza · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jonathan Orenstein mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-26 · RFL:Return to Senders:Leshem/Piazza · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jonathan Orenstein mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-17 · RH:Double Shots North:Siebert/Mendillo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynn Siebert
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4
L
2026-06-03 · RH:Double Shots North:Siebert/Mendillo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Piazza
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-05-31 · RFL:Return to Senders:Leshem/Piazza · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jonathan Orenstein mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-31 · RFL:Return to Senders:Leshem/Piazza · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Raul Valdes mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
56.3%
85W–66L · 51.3% of games
4.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 33.3% of games
7.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 44.3% of games
8.0mixed
57.8%
37W–27L · 51.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 68% of the time
#1 Doubles
68%
156 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
26 matches
#1 Singles
3%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova