← Search

Sujit Chakravorti

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Danville, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
146 matches · 35W–111L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history146 matches
W
2026-11-01 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM7.5C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sushil Rajendran
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-26 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM7.5C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sushil Rajendran
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-10-18 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM7.5C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chris Lee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-01 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM7.5C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tim van der Waart van Gulik
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-09-13 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM7.5C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Gangarapu
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-06 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM7.5C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matthew Hedges
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-30 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CM7.5C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chris Lee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-12 · BENICIA TA/BENICIA HS 55AM8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mike Connerley
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-09 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AM4.0C · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Behling
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-05-03 · BENICIA TA/BENICIA HS 55AM8.0A · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rajat Jain
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-15 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AM4.0C · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Kincaid
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-15 · WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 40AM4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hosoon Ku
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
22%
18W–64L · 39.6% of games
4.5
17.6%
3W–14L · 30.8% of games
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 46% of games
7.5
38.5%
10W–16L · 44.2% of games
8.0
0%
0W–4L · 37.8% of games
8.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 35.8% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 39.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
41 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova