← Search

Emily Kaiser

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
— year-end
5 matches · 4W–1L · seasons 2019–2019
Match history5 matches
W
2019-08-27 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 3.0 W, Laker (IRC-D) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Schmahl
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2019-07-30 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 3.0 W, Laker (IRC-D) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Agricola
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2019-07-23 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 3.0 W, Laker (IRC-D) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alison McConnell
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
W
2019-06-25 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 3.0 W, Laker (IRC-D) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Molly Winkler
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2019-06-06 · CIN Indianapolis, A18&O 3.0 W, Laker (IRC-D) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Scott
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 59.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 60% of the time
#3 Doubles
60%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert