← Search

Cathy Chi

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pittsburgh, PA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 40W–19L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history59 matches
W
2026-10-18 · PTA · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Radick
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-29 · 9.0 Mount Lebanon · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kathy Radick
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-5
W
2026-07-12 · 9.0 Mount Lebanon · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kathy Radick
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-3
L
2026-07-11 · PTA · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathy Radick
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-13 · PTA · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathy Radick
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-06 · PTA · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Deborah Brill
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-31 · Glen Creek · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Eleni Dedousis
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · Glen Creek · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathy Radick
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-06 · PTA · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathy Radick championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-06 · PTA · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathy Radick championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-09 · PTA · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathy Radick
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-08-03 · Glen Creek Sideliners · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kathy Radick
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 59.6% of games
3.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
76.5%
13W–4L · 60.5% of games
4.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 42.7% of games
8.5
100%
5W–0L · 61.4% of games
9.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
39%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
8 matches
Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova