← Search

Judi Robeson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Richardson, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
314 matches · 146W–168L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history314 matches
L
2026-10-23 · Team 27 High Point/Escutia-Gomez W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Phyllis McGahey
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-18 · Team 8 High Point/Herling W3.5S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristine Killmeyer
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-18 · Team 8 High Point/Herling W3.5S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Jackson
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-10-16 · Team 27 High Point/Escutia-Gomez W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eve Liu
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-09 · Team 27 High Point/Escutia-Gomez W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Schussler
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-20 · Team 8 High Point/Herling W3.5S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristine Killmeyer
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-09-18 · Team 27 High Point/Escutia-Gomez W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beata Walenda
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-13 · Team 8 High Point/Herling W3.5S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristine Killmeyer
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-11 · Team 27 High Point/Escutia-Gomez W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beata Walenda
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-20 · High Point/Herling W3.5S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Reynolds
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-06 · High Point/Herling W3.5S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Dres
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-04 · High Point/Stolakis-Ferrell W7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jean Sills
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams87 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
49.7%
97W–98L · 49.9% of games
4.0
26.2%
11W–31L · 39% of games
7.0
50%
33W–33L · 50.9% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
127 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
101 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
64 matches
#2 Singles
3%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
8 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer