← Search

Randolph Beerman

— year-end
46 matches · 34W–12L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Randolph Beerman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
L
2022-03-19 · GV Ratlers · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Timothy Keillor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2022-03-18 · PHX/CoxTanham/65Over/8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Timothy Shum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2022-03-18 · PHX/CoxTanham/65Over/8.0M · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with George Orchard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2022-02-12 · GV Ratlers · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Bruce Goad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2022-02-12 · #1 Doubles · with G F Tanham championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
David Morgan / Dean Low
2022-02-11 · #2 Doubles · with Timothy Shum championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2022-02-05 · GV Ratlers · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Charlie Dolezal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2022-01-22 · GV Ratlers · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Timothy Keillor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
Robert Patterson / David Tucker
2021-03-26 · 8.0 PTC Cox/Tanham M65S · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Timothy Shum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
John Davis / David Tucker
2021-03-26 · 8.0 PTC Cox/Tanham M65S · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Craig Zirbel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2021-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Garcia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2021-03-06 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Patrick Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
Teams3 teams · 2021–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 60.2% of games
4.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 41.7% of games
8.0
100%
12W–0L · 66.2% of games
9.0
50%
5W–5L · 48.9% of games
8.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
13 matches
#1 Singles
13%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
6 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert