← Search

Mary Chau

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Alhambra, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
189 matches · 95W–94L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history189 matches
L
2026-10-31 · SGV Chow Fun- Chow-Arcadia-SA11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Seeun Mok
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-10-24 · SGV Chow Fun- Chow-Arcadia/ SA 11 · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-09-26 · SGV Chow Fun- Chow-Arcadia-SA11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Seeun Mok
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-19 · SGV Chow Fun- Chow-Arcadia/ SA 11 · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-02 · SGV Smashers 2026-Kagan-WN/SA8 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Virginia Takeuchi
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-18 · SGV Smashers 2026-Kagan-WN/SA8 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pei Fu
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-13 · SGV Smashers 2026-Kagan-WN/SA8 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pei Fu
loading the estimate
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-06-06 · SGV Smashers 2026-Kagan-WN/SA8 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pei Fu
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-31 · SGV Chow Fun- Chow-Arroyo High-SA10 · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-30 · SGV Smashers 2026-Kagan-WN/SA8 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keiko Kagan
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-05-16 · SGV Chow Fun- Chow-Arroyo High-SA10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alisa MacKey
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-16 · SGV Smashers 2026-Kagan-WN/SA8 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Laun
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 54.8% of games
4.0
51.4%
72W–68L · 51% of games
7.0
50%
3W–3L · 54.4% of games
8.0
0%
0W–4L · 38.6% of games
9.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 48.2% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
39 matches
#1 Singles
16%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
29 matches
#2 Singles
11%
20 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer