← Search

Scott Enge

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Olathe, KS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
59 matches · 44W–15L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history59 matches
W
2026-05-02 · Cox, Chris · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with David May
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-04-11 · Cox, Chris · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lanny Wake
loading the estimate
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-12 · Warkentine · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dave Hoover
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-11-24 · Warkentine · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Brown
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-03-29 · Cox, Chris · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barry Waldron
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-02-22 · Cox, Chris · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wilbur Jones
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-02-02 · Cox, Chris · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emmett Logan
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-01-25 · Cox, Chris · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David May
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-01-19 · Cox, Chris · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gregory Russell
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-01-11 · Cox, Chris · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Russell Packard
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-06-23 · HOA/Claussen/55&Over8.0M · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ravi Peru
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-4
W
2024-06-09 · HOA/Claussen/55&Over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ravi Peru
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
50%
3W–3L · 54.8% of games
4.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
76.5%
26W–8L · 58.2% of games
8.0mixed
85.7%
12W–2L · 60.1% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 54% of the time
#2 Doubles
54%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova