← Search

Monica Adams

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
CAPE CORAL, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 47W–18L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history65 matches
W
Default
2026-08-31 · Courts at Cape Coral - Riccio · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Duncan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-22 · Courts at Cape Coral - Riccio · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robin Riccio
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
L
2025-02-11 · Lake Kennedy - Riccio · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Riccio
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-02-07 · Lake Kennedy - Riccio · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathrin Matzen
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-02-04 · Lake Kennedy - Riccio · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Duncan
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-01-25 · Lake Kennedy - Riccio · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alexandria Dahms
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-12-04 · Lake Kennedy - Riccio · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heather Humann
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-06-17 · Hancock - Riccio · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Denise Iannuzzi
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-04-29 · Hancock - Riccio · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Denise Iannuzzi
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-04-08 · Hancock - Riccio · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mary Alice Spencer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 1-6
W
2021-06-17 · The Plantation - Haines · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Amber Moorman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2021-05-13 · The Plantation - Haines · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Marino
loading the estimate
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
100%
6W–0L · 78.3% of games
3.5
84.2%
32W–6L · 63.8% of games
4.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 48% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert