← Search

Glynnis Gillespie

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
ANTHEM, AZ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 45W–31L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history76 matches
W
2026-04-01 · 8.0 PTC Stockdale W65S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Rather
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-11 · 8.0 PTC Stockdale W65S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Harris
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-02-04 · 8.0 PTC Stockdale W65S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Garbaciak
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-03-22 · 8.0 ISP BannisterWilliams W55S · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adonica Gower
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-03-01 · 8.0 ISP BannisterWilliams W55S · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Shepps
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-22 · 8.0 ISP BannisterWilliams W55S · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martha Mckeand
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 5-7
L
2025-02-15 · 8.0 ISP BannisterWilliams W55S · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia White
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-01 · 8.0 ISP BannisterWilliams W55S · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Allyn Engman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-11-23 · 8.0 ISP BannisterWilliams W55F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Elizabeth Bannister
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-0
W
2024-11-02 · 8.0 ISP BannisterWilliams W55F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martha Mckeand
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2024-10-19 · 8.0 ISP BannisterWilliams W55F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carolee Williams
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 4-6
L
2024-10-13 · 8.0 ISP BannisterWilliams W55F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adonica Gower
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 60.4% of games
8.0
55.6%
35W–28L · 50.7% of games
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
42%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal