← Search

Jon Bayne

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Woodland Park, CO
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
84 matches · 43W–41L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history84 matches
L
2025-08-24 · MEMPK HENRY · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Wendy Rhoten mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
W
2025-08-10 · MEMPK HENRY · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimberly Davis mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-20 · MEMPK HENRY · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimberly Davis mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-5
L
2025-07-06 · MEMPK BREESE · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Leanne Thompson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-06-29 · MEMPK BREESE · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Leanne Thompson mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-06-22 · MEMPK BREESE · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristina Bodoczky mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2025-06-08 · MEMPK BREESE · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diana Garcia-Poore mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 4-1
W
2025-06-01 · MEMPK BREESE · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristina Bodoczky mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-05-18 · CCOC ACKERMAN · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christina Bardsley mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-05-04 · CCOC ACKERMAN · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sara Breese mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-3
L
2025-04-20 · CCOC ACKERMAN · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christina Bardsley mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-04-13 · CCOC ACKERMAN · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christina Bardsley mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
60%
18W–12L · 55.3% of games
8.0mixed
45%
18W–22L · 50.3% of games
8.5mixed
50%
7W–7L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
11 matches
#1 Singles
8%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams