← Search

Janice Flanagan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Roswell, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 36W–32L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history68 matches
W
2026-07-21 · Horseshoe Bend (Barbara Gradolf)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Rayburn Richards
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-14 · Horseshoe Bend (Barbara Gradolf)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Oetting
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-30 · Horseshoe Bend (Barbara Gradolf)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Rayburn Richards
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-26 · Horseshoe Bend (Barbara Gradolf)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teri Fischer
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · Horseshoe Bend (Barbara Gradolf)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Gradolf
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-15 · Horseshoe Bend (Barbara Gradolf)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Oetting
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 7-6
W
2026-01-13 · Horseshoe Bend (Barbara Gradolf)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liz Zacharias
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-01-06 · Horseshoe Bend (Barbara Gradolf)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liz Zacharias
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-12-09 · Horseshoe Bend (Barbara Gradolf)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liz Zacharias
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-11-18 · Horseshoe Bend (Barbara Gradolf)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bernie DeWit
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 6-2
L
2025-01-09 · Horseshoe Bend (Barbara Gradolf)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liz Zacharias
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2024-12-05 · Horseshoe Bend (Barbara Gradolf)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynette Aldworth
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
63.6%
14W–8L · 50.5% of games
4.0
47.8%
22W–24L · 47.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
22%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
13 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer