← Search

Stephanie Hurley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Peterborough, NH
3.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
33 matches · 22W–11L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history33 matches
L
2026-09-27 · MITC:Monadnockers:Dunn:Kemp · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gail Bleakley
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-20 · MITC:Monadnockers:Dunn:Kemp · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cher Barker
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2022-06-22 · MON:TheRacquettes:Taylor · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth MacEachran
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
W
2022-06-15 · MON:TheRacquettes:Taylor · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth MacEachran
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2022-06-08 · MON:TheRacquettes:Taylor · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cher Barker
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2022-06-01 · MON:TheRacquettes:Taylor · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annette Taylor
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-5
W
2022-04-27 · MON:TheRacquettes:Taylor · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cher Barker
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2021-07-22 · CON:Dahme · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cher Barker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-2
W
2021-07-08 · CON:Dahme · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cher Barker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
L
2021-06-24 · CON:Dahme · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barb Teach
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
L
2021-06-10 · CON:Dahme · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barb Teach
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
W
2021-04-01 · MON:MacEachran:Hurley · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gloria Morison
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
75%
6W–2L · 53.4% of games
6.0
64%
16W–9L · 54.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 61% of the time
#1 Doubles
61%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert