Marie VanTubbergen
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ann Arbor, MI
37 matches · 19W–18L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history37 matches
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-4
L
Daniel Carlson / Nisha Jam
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-7
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2019–2024
1CHIP-SLADE 8.0 MIXED 40&O SEM F1
3CHIP-FORMICOLA 18&O MIX 9.0 SEM
4CHIP-FORMICOLA 9.0 MIXED 40&O SEM
3CHIP-FORMICOLA MIX18&O 90 SEM
4CHIP-FORMICOLA AD18&O 45NW WED SEM
2CHIP-FORMICOLA 85 WW COMBO SEM F1
3CHIP-FORMICOLA 9.0 18&O MIXED SEM F2
LIB-SAULD 8.0 40&O Mixed SEM
1CHIP-FORMICOLA 40&OVER 90MIX F2
drop CHIP-BERG 45nw 18 wed sem F
drop CHIP-FORMICOLA 90mix 18 sem F
4CHIP-BERG 85 combo women SEM F2
5CHIP-BERG 45NW 18 WED SEM F2
R2 CHIP-BERG WOMENS TRI-LEVEL 4.5,4.0,3.5 SEM
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 53.6% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 43.8% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 49% of the time
#2 Doubles
49%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
38%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
5 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.