← Search

Ursula Curran

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
NEWPORT, RI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
19 matches · 9W–10L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history19 matches
W
2025-07-31 · GMS: Middletown Marvels/Maurer/Twomey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristi Chesher
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-07-18 · GMS: Middletown Marvels/Maurer/Twomey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Katherine Mainzer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 2-3
L
2025-07-16 · GMS: Middletown Marvels/Maurer/Twomey · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maureen Maurer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
W
2024-07-30 · MID: Middletown Marvels/Maurer/Twomey · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leslie Murphy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-0
W
2024-07-22 · MID: Middletown Marvels/Maurer/Twomey · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Guinan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-4, 4-2
L
2024-06-27 · MID: Middletown Marvels/Maurer/Twomey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Darby
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2023-08-10 · MID: Middletown Marvels/Maurer/Twomey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristi Chesher
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 7-5, 0-2
W
2023-07-13 · MID: Middletown Marvels/Maurer/Twomey · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Nunes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
L
2023-06-20 · MID: Middletown Marvels/Maurer/Twomey · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Darby
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-7
W
2023-06-15 · MID: Middletown Marvels/Maurer/Twomey · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Nunes
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-0
L
2022-08-09 · A HOF: Hall of Famers/Maurer/Twomey · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Lennox
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2022-08-04 · A HOF: Hall of Famers/Maurer/Twomey · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristi Chesher
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
7.0
47.4%
9W–10L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams