Search

Cindy Madsen

Tucson, AZ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
242 matches · 110W–132L · seasons 20192026

Captains: add Cindy Madsen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history242 matches
L
2026-06-05 · Net Threats · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynne Tomasa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-27 · Net Threats · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Shipley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-14 · Mixed Plate · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe Parker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-06 · Net Threats · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Klingberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · Mixed Plate · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe Parker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-24 · Net Threats · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marnie Binney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-04-18 · Net Threats · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Rogers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-10 · Net Threats · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbi Holden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-18 · Sweet & Sassy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Gee-Gray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-07 · Sweet & Sassy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Gee-Gray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-04 · Sweet & Sassy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbi Holden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-31 · Sweet & Sassy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jody Little
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
45.1%
37W–45L · 49.1% of games
4.0
52.3%
23W–21L · 49.6% of games
7.0
59%
23W–16L · 53.6% of games
8.0
50%
4W–4L · 48.3% of games
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
30%
6W–14L · 43.1% of games
8.0mixed
39.5%
15W–23L · 47% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer