← Search

Andrea Burdette

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Anderson, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
151 matches · 111W–40L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history151 matches
L
2026-09-29 · FTA18S/Burdette/Brookstone · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-22 · FTA18S/Burdette/Brookstone · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-08-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Srinivas Lokaranjan mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carter Botts mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · FTA (B) 3.5-2.5W 18 & Over (Botts) · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Aimee Duffy
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · UPTA (A) 3.5M 18 & Over (Pack) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colin Gallagher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-01 · UPTA (A) 3.5M 18 & Over (Pack) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carter Botts mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-28 · UPTA (A) 3.5M 18 & Over (Pack) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carter Botts mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-27 · FTA (B) 3.5-2.5W 18 & Over (Botts) · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Melodee Rosopa
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · FTA18TL/Brookstone/Burton · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kara Powder
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-23 · UPTA (A) 3.5M 18 & Over (Pack) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Johnny Pack mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-17 · UPTA (A) 3.5M 40 & Over (Burdette) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Keen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
91.7%
11W–1L · 60.9% of games
3.0
70.8%
17W–7L · 63.3% of games
3.5
61.4%
27W–17L · 54.7% of games
5.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
81.2%
13W–3L · 59.8% of games
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
69.6%
16W–7L · 55.8% of games
4.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 59.6% of games
7.0mixed
93.3%
14W–1L · 64.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
33 matches
#1 Singles
13%
20 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#3 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer