← Search

John Flagg

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
148 matches · 76W–72L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history148 matches
L
2026-10-15 · Be.Barnhill55C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gerard Auvergne
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-09 · Be.Barnhill55C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Rowe
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-10-07 · Be.Barnhill40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Charles Gowland
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
W
Default
2026-10-06 · Be.Barnhill40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Charles Gowland
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-29 · Be.Barnhill55C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Pedro Loaiza
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-09-16 · Be.Barnhill40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brian Soltz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-08 · Be.Barnhill55C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Testa
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-26 · Be.Barnhill40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brian Soltz
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-25 · Wi.Turner55A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Cockrill
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-24 · Wi.Turner55A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Testa
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-03-03 · Wi.Turner55A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christof Jensen
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-13 · Be.Barnhill40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Knox
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
62.8%
54W–32L · 54.4% of games
4.0
8.3%
1W–11L · 40.3% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
45.2%
19W–23L · 48.7% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 44.2% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
36 matches
#1 Singles
11%
16 matches
#2 Singles
7%
10 matches
#3 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams