← Search

Jacob Silacci

Charlotte, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
28 matches · 18W–10L · seasons 2024–2026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
4.16
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 4.0
98%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Charlotte · 4.5
9 of 28
NC · 4.5
13 of 46
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Jacob is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jacob has been a steady 4.5 across all 2 seasons on record.

4.04.520242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Jacob has gone from the 57th to the 35th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 50% of games
4.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 61.7% of games
8.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 58.1% of games
9.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 56.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history28 matches
W
Lori Little / Aiden Aldrichmixed
2026-08-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jackie Gaine
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
Linda Radovich / Taylor Kalistermixed
2026-07-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Maria Emilia de la Orden
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
Taylor Kalister / Danielle Delanceymixed
2026-06-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Madeline Weih
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
Wyatt Fleming / Madison Utzmixed
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Maria Emilia de la Orden
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Katie Lai / Kevin Phammixedchamps
2025-12-12 · #1 Doubles · with KC Mattingly-Nelson
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-11-09 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Vaiana Guittet
+0.000better than expected — took 65% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
2025-11-02 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with KC Mattingly-Nelson
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-10-26 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Rebecca Chen
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-10-25 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jamie Schroeder
+0.000about as expected — took 71% of games against 71% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-10-18 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Vaiana Guittet
+0.000about as expected — took 55% of games against 54% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Ben Falk - (DQ) / Hejin Yimmixed
2025-10-05 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with KC Mattingly-Nelson
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
Eryn Muetzel / Jeffrey Jablonskimixed
2025-10-04 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kirsi Varsa
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.