Candace Meyers
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pinckney, MI
50 matches · 19W–31L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history50 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 7-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 3-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 0-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2024
3HV-COFFEY 7.0 MIXED 40&O SEM F1
4VTC-inside-FADEL AD65&O FRI 60 WOMEN SEM
2HV-CLARKE MIX18&O 70 SEM F2
4HV-COFFEY Mixed 40&O 7.0 SEM F2
6VTC-FADEL 7.0 MIXED 55&OVER SEM F1
4VTC-FADEL 70 MIX 55&O SEM
6HV-COFFEY 7.0 mix 40&O SEM f1
1HV-LADENHEIM 65WW COMBO SEM F3
2LIB-OBRIEN 7.0 40&O Mixed SEM F2
2VTC-FADEL 70 MIX 55&O SEM
1HV-BELCHER 40&OVER 70MIX F2
5HV-FADEL WSING 30W WIN F2
1HV-BELCHER 70 mix 40&O sem f2
1HV-FADEL 65 combo women SEM F2
3HV-BELCHER 35NW 18 MON SEM F5
5HV-BELCHER 7.0 mix 18&O sem f4
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.8% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
43.8%
7W–9L · 46% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
9 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#3 Singles
2%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.