← Search

Febbie Quirante

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
RICHMOND, TX
4.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
64 matches · 47W–17L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history64 matches
L
2026-10-25 · LLTC - Misfits · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jonathan Kwong mixed
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-18 · LLTC - Misfits · #4 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sean Esquivel mixed
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-10-11 · LLTC - Misfits · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jonathan Kwong mixed
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-09-27 · LLTC - Misfits · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Victor Sun mixed
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
W
2020-02-16 · LLTC - Mismatched Misfits · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Erwin Caeg mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-6
W
2019-11-17 · LLTC - Mismatched Misfits · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Erwin Caeg mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2019-11-10 · LLTC - Mismatched Misfits · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Erwin Caeg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2019-11-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elvia Ross
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2019-11-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elvia Ross
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2019-11-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elvia Ross
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
W
2019-11-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elvia Ross
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2019-11-03 · LLTC - Mismatched Misfits · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Erwin Caeg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
79.5%
31W–8L · 61% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 45.8% of games
8.0mixed
78.9%
15W–4L · 59.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
33 matches
#1 Singles
20%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams