← Search

Catherine Hurley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Rochester, MN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
134 matches · 37W–97L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history134 matches
L
2026-10-11 · Racquet Scientists Hurley RAC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amelia Barwise
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-04 · Racquet Scientists Hurley RAC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amelia Barwise
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-13 · Racquet Scientists Hurley RAC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amelia Barwise
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-22 · 40 Love Skalski Clark RAC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paramita Majumder championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-21 · 40 Love Skalski Clark RAC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Duchateau championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-21 · Leopard Lobbers Skalski/Clark RAC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paramita Majumder
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-23 · Leopard Lobbers Skalski/Clark RAC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leslie Clark
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-09 · Leopard Lobbers Skalski/Clark RAC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leslie Clark
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-02 · Leopard Lobbers Skalski/Clark RAC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Helena Soares
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-19 · Leopard Lobbers Skalski/Clark RAC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynne Peterson
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-03 · 40 Love Skalski Clark RAC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Hartert
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-04-26 · 40 Love Skalski Clark RAC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Hartert
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
34.6%
27W–51L · 43.1% of games
3.5
17.6%
6W–28L · 36.1% of games
6.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 38.6% of games
6.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 46.7% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
37 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert