← Search

Greg Volz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Landenberg, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
123 matches · 71W–52L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history123 matches
L
2025-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Perry Walker
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peter Leida
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
Prem Kumar / Venkat Karthik Kodali
2025-04-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Chapman
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2023-11-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Perri Volz mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
W
2023-11-03 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Emily Serwo mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-5
W
2023-07-10 · Smashers Winter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathan Volz
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2023-07-08 · Smashers Winter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathan Volz
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-2
L
2023-07-05 · Smashers Winter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathan Volz
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2023-07-02 · Smashers Winter · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nathan Volz
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2023-06-28 · Smashers Winter · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anand Natrajan
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2023-06-20 · Smashers Winter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Hyland
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2023-06-17 · Smashers Winter · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Calvin Haupt
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2022–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
62.5%
45W–27L · 55.4% of games
7.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.1% of games
7.0mixed
46.3%
19W–22L · 50.9% of games
8.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal