← Search

William Rucker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Houston, TX
4.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
72 matches · 51W–21L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history72 matches
L
2026-06-18 · LLTC - String Theory · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Naish Zhang
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-11 · LLTC - String Theory · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Martinez
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-03-18 · LLTC - Spin Theory · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alan Lee
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-16 · Memorial Club - Sweet N Salty · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephanie Paul mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
2025-11-09 · Memorial Club - Sweet N Salty · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephanie Paul mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-10-26 · Memorial Club - Sweet N Salty · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephanie Paul mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-10-19 · Memorial Club - Sweet N Salty · #4 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephanie Paul mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-10-12 · Memorial Club - Sweet N Salty · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephanie Paul mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-06-22 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amber Cruickshank mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-01 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amber Cruickshank mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linh Do mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 5-7
W
2025-05-25 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christelle Chacar mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
61.9%
13W–8L · 54.1% of games
4.5
50%
2W–2L · 54.2% of games
7.0mixed
85.7%
24W–4L · 63.7% of games
8.0mixed
63.2%
12W–7L · 55.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
9 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert