← Search

Beth Rattner-Renz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fort Myers, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
112 matches · 64W–48L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history112 matches
L
2026-01-05 · Palmira / Albright · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christine Siciliano
loading the estimate
3-4
W
Default
2025-12-01 · The Quarry / Albright · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Crum
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-11-14 · The Quarry / Albright · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Candace Azad
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2025-11-10 · The Quarry / Albright · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carla Klumpp
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-11-03 · The Quarry / Albright · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angela Knapp
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-27 · The Quarry / Albright · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Veronique Desaulniers
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 2-2
W
2025-10-20 · The Quarry / Albright · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Veronique Desaulniers
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-10-13 · The Quarry / Albright · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tina Albright
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
W
2024-06-17 · Paseo - Zimmer · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sheri Coleman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-05-08 · Paseo - Zimmer · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sheri Coleman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-7
W
2024-04-22 · Paseo - Zimmer · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sheri Coleman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-4
W
2024-04-15 · Paseo - Zimmer · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sheri Coleman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
75%
3W–1L · 64.2% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 39.5% of games
7.5
58.8%
30W–21L · 53.9% of games
8.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.9% of games
8.0mixed
59.5%
25W–17L · 52.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe