Search

Chandra Panley

New Albany, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
167 matches · 78W–89L · seasons 20192026

Captains: add Chandra Panley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history167 matches
L
Megan Williams / Kaitie Kirchner
2026-08-13 · NACC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carmela Meade
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-09 · NACC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carmela Meade
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
Jodi Rhodes / Sana Khwaja
2026-07-02 · NACC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Natasha Petroff
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-5
L
Angela Flanigan / Sylvie Lederer
2026-06-25 · NACC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Reem Ghanem
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
Michelle Robinson / Diane Berlet
2026-06-18 · NACC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carmela Meade
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-11 · NACC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carmela Meade
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-11 · Wickertree · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Renee Ciminello
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-04-20 · Wickertree · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Renee Ciminello
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-04-16 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Beth Gittins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-13 · Wickertree · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susan Denny
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 5-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-05 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephanie Demers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-26 · New Albany · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephanie Demers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
60%
33W–22L · 53.4% of games
4.0
27.1%
19W–51L · 41.7% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 49.4% of games
7.5
60.5%
23W–15L · 50.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams