← Search

Nancy Barker

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Colorado Springs, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
219 matches · 148W–71L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history219 matches
W
2026-08-31 · CSRC MCPHERSON · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Olivia Salmon
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-24 · CSRC MCPHERSON · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Olivia Salmon
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-16 · CSRC BARKER · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kenneth Thornton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-16 · CSRC BARKER · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hunter Renn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-08-09 · CSRC BARKER · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diego Medina mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-09 · CSRC BARKER · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hunter Renn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · CSRC MCPHERSON · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Olivia Salmon
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-13 · CSRC SIEGEL · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Siegel
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · CSRC BARKER · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrew Aronson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-07-12 · CSRC BARKER · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hunter Renn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · CSRC SIEGEL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ursula Duran
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-05 · CSRC BARKER · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Palazzo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
60%
54W–36L · 53.3% of games
7.0mixed
83.3%
35W–7L · 60.5% of games
7.5mixed
52%
13W–12L · 51.5% of games
8.0mixed
73.3%
33W–12L · 57.6% of games
8.5mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 56.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
73 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
38 matches
#1 Singles
4%
9 matches
Singles
2%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova