← Search

Jeff Deng

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Irvine, CA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 53W–33L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history86 matches
W
2026-06-20 · OC Irvine Southlake - Jeff - Sat1 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ronald Brewer
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · OC Irvine Southlake - Jeff - Sat1 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Zhang
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-30 · OC Irvine Southlake - Jeff - Sat1 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Nguyen
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-16 · OC LLW Southlake - Jeff - Sat1 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brian Su championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · OC Irvine Southlake - Jeff - Sat1 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kevin Springer
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-29 · OC LLW Southlake - Jeff - Sat1 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kevin Quinn
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-22 · OC LLW Southlake - Jeff - Sat1 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Zhang
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-03-01 · OC LLW Southlake - Jeff - Sat1 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Phong Nguyen
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-21 · OC LLW Southlake - Jeff - Sat1 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with York Cheng
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-1
W
2025-11-29 · OC LLW Irvine Southlake - Jeff - Sat12 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Zhang
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-11-22 · OC LLW Irvine Southlake - Jeff - Sat12 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with York Cheng
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-11-02 · OC LLW Irvine Southlake - Jeff - Sat12 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kevin Young
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
68.6%
48W–22L · 53.7% of games
5.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 29% of games
9.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 51.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
24 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova