← Search

Donna McClanahan

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Beavercreek, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
442 matches · 256W–186L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history442 matches
W
2026-10-25 · QRRC-Denker · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Schuler
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-10-14 · STC-Brann · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melonie Johnson
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-09-27 · QRRC-Denker · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenifer Klump
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-26 · QRRC-Wiley · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mindy Watts
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-16 · QRRC-Buerschen · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Hann
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-14 · KTC-McClanahan · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Newell
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-31 · QRRC-Buerschen · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Elizabeth Newell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-05-26 · KTC-McClanahan · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Wu
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-03 · KTC-Shively · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Therese McNea-Wiley
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-18 · QRRC-Denker · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalie Denker
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-15 · QRRC-Denker · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Dull
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-03-01 · QRRC-Denker · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams114 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
74.9%
128W–43L · 60.7% of games
4.5
38.2%
39W–63L · 45% of games
6.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 66.9% of games
7.5
65%
13W–7L · 54.4% of games
8.0
100%
5W–0L · 62% of games
8.5
59.4%
19W–13L · 52.5% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 48.9% of games
8.0mixed
53.8%
21W–18L · 53.9% of games
9.0mixed
44%
11W–14L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
129 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
106 matches
#1 Singles
22%
99 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
63 matches
#2 Singles
8%
33 matches
Singles
3%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams