← Search

Andrew Chun

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Honolulu, HI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 10W–21L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history31 matches
L
2026-04-19 · Latecomers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carl Yamaguchi
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-15 · Latecomers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Lee
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-05 · Latecomers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gene Higa
loading the estimate
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-28 · Latecomers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Glen Masaki
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-15 · Latecomers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Darrell Zane
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-08 · Latecomers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Glen Masaki
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-27 · Latecomers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Sue
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-04-06 · Latecomers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Sue
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-03-30 · Latecomers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Darrell Zane
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-23 · Latecomers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ricky Kai
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-06-02 · Latecomers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vincent Amoroso
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-05-26 · Latecomers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Emmanuel Legaspi
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
7.0
32.3%
10W–21L · 41.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert