← Search

Jane Tuttle

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Topsham, ME
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
140 matches · 60W–80L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history140 matches
W
2026-06-13 · MP:SwingQueens:Walek · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nobuko Walek
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-07 · MP:SwingQueens:Walek · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-17 · MP:SwingQueens:Walek · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-02 · MP:SwingQueens:Walek · #2 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · MP:SwingQueens:Walek · #2 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-03-07 · MP:James · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alyson Cummings
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-07 · MP:James · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Wendy Greenbaum
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2024-11-17 · MP:MainePines:Greenbaum · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Wendy Greenbaum
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 1-6
W
2024-11-02 · MP:MainePines:Greenbaum · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Wendy Greenbaum
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
L
2024-10-20 · MP:MainePines:Greenbaum · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Wendy Greenbaum
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2024-10-05 · MP:MainePines:Greenbaum · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elaine Dube
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
L
2024-04-27 · MP:Serve'sUp:Ledwidge:Pantaz · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
63.8%
30W–17L · 54.2% of games
3.5
16%
8W–42L · 36% of games
6.0
68.2%
15W–7L · 55.3% of games
7.0
33.3%
5W–10L · 42.2% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 42.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 30% of the time
#1 Singles
30%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
27 matches
#2 Singles
9%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe