← Search

Jeanne Adams

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tyler, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 50W–42L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history92 matches
W
2026-10-10 · Peterson -Faulkner · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cheryl Terry
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-09-26 · Peterson -Faulkner · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cheryl Terry
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-09-19 · Peterson -Faulkner · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cheryl Terry
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-08 · Peterson - Faulkner · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cheryl Terry
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-03-21 · Peterson/70/3.0/W/TX · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robin Carroll
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-20 · Peterson/70/3.0/W/TX · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robin Carroll
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-01 · Peterson - Faulkner · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cheryl Terry
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-04 · Peterson - Faulkner · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cheryl Terry
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-09-27 · Peterson - Faulkner · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jill Hamil
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-1
W
2025-09-06 · Peterson - Faulkner · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Melinda Ross
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-08-23 · Peterson - Faulkner · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cheryl Terry
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Sharon Beall / Jennifer Johnston
2025-04-12 · Peterson - Faulkner · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Robin Carroll
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
51.5%
35W–33L · 50.6% of games
6.0
63.2%
12W–7L · 51.5% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer