← Search

Derstin Crousen

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Abilene, TX
4.5D year-end 2026
i
Disqualification — a rule enforcement, not a computed rating
8 matches · 6W–2L · seasons 2024–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2026. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history8 matches
W
2026-07-14 · Hoke Team · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · Hoke Team · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-13 · Hoke Team · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-08-15 · Causer Team · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chase Daniell mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2024-07-30 · Causer Team · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chase Daniell mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2024-07-25 · Causer Team · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chase Daniell mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
W
2024-07-23 · Causer Team · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Chase Daniell mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
L
2024-07-18 · Causer Team · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Emmanuel Navejas mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 59.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
3 matches
#2 Singles
38%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
1 match
#3 Doubles
13%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King