← Search

Richard Braden

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Buffalo, NY
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
79 matches · 26W–53L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history79 matches
W
2025-05-04 · Fuller · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Dillon mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-04-11 · Fuller · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pauline Kuun mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-04-06 · Fuller · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pauline Kuun mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-03-23 · Fuller · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Dillon mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-06-27 · Buffalo One · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donald Lofaso
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-05-30 · Buffalo One · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kamu Pindiprolu
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2024-05-16 · Buffalo One · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Gottfried
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2023-08-16 · Fuller · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Espinoza
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2023-08-12 · Fuller · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Glennon
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-08-02 · Fuller · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Glennon
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2023-07-26 · Fuller · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Espinoza
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2023-07-19 · Fuller · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Glennon
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
50%
13W–13L · 50% of games
3.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 37.9% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
20.8%
5W–19L · 40.6% of games
7.0mixed
31.6%
6W–13L · 39.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal